Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why We Should Prioritize Learning about Science

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Socioscientific issues in pre-college science classrooms. In D.L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 41–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G.S. (1990). Scientific/technological literacy, critical reasoning, and classroom practice. In S.P. Norris & L.M. Phillips (Eds.), Foundations of literacy policy in Canada. Calgary, AB: Detselig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G.S. (2005). Research into STS science education. Educacion Quimica, 16(30), 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2003). Scientific myth-conceptions. Science Education, 87(3), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans (A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.W. (1999). Inscriptions and science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 973–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A.B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2), 91–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimov, I. (1983). Popularizing science. Nature, 306(5929), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching pupils “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R.L. (2003). Exploring the role of NOS understandings in decision-making. In D.L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 63–79). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C.A. (1996). The cultural dimensions of ecological literacy. Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C.A. (1999). Changing the dominant cultural perspective in education. In G.A. Smith & D.R. Williams (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture and the environment (pp. 161–178). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. CHECK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 715–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Council of Ministers of Education. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes. Toronto: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., & Novik, R. (1984). Scientific and technological education in an information society. Science Education, 68(4), 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C, & Chia, L.-G. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using students’ questions to drive knowledge production. Science Education, 88(5), 7070–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, J. (1996). Scientific literacy: Whose science? Whose literacy? In D. Baker, J. Clay, & C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing: In English, mathematics and science (pp. 184–193). Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. (2004). Science and citizenship education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1751–1763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G.E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? Hntemational Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R.A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S.F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systematic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourez, G. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy as social practice. Social Studies of Science, 27, 903–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, P.L., Carss, M.C., Grice, R.D., Endean, L., & Warry, M. (1997). Towards scientific literacy for the third millennium: A view from Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamarnikow, E., & Green, A. (2000). Citizenship, education and social capital. In D. Lawton, J. Cairns, & R. Gardner (Eds.), Education for citizenship. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddis, A.N. (1991). Improving the quality of classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada. (1991). Prosperity through competitiveness. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, W., & Boite, C. (Eds.). (1997). Scientific literacy: An international symposium. Kiel, Germany: Institut fur die Padagogik der Naturwiseenschaften (IPN) an der Universität Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1994). Seeking directions for change: The personalisation and poiiticisation of science education. Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 71–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1998). Science fiction: The continuing misrepresentation of science in the school curriculum. Curriculum Studies, 6(2), 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P.D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P.D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review, 71(256), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E.W. (1994). Scientific literacy. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 9; pp. 5345–5350). Oxford: Pergamoh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E.W. (1996). Scientific literacy: A functional construct. In D. Baker, J. Clay, & C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing: In English, mathematics and science (pp. 43–51). Lewes, United Kingdom: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolsto, S.D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugly-Smolska, E.T. (1990). Scientific literacy in developed and developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 12(5), 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R.C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCorbeiller, P. (1959). Education in science: Prerequisite for national survival. Daedalus, 88(1), 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N.G., Schwartz, R.S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R.L. (2001). Pre-service teachers’ understanding and teaching of nature of science: An intervention study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(2), 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-S., & Songer, N.B. (2003). Making science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2001). Should controversial issues in science be taught through the humanities? School Science Review, 82(300), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2004). Teaching bioethics in science: Crossing a bridge too far? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(3), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longbottom, J.E., & Butler, P.H. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education. Science Education, 83(4), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (1994). The fate of knowledge in social theories of science. In F.T. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W.F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W.F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W.F., Clough, M.P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3–39). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, R.C. (1958). Towards a population literate in science. Science Teacher, 25, 366–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, C.E. (1998). Philosophically correct science stories? Examining the implications of heroic stories for school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, C.E., & Taylor, P.C. (1998). Between myth and a hard place. In W.W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-cultural perspective on science education (pp. 25–48). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H. (1980). Analyzing teaching for intellectual independence. In H. Munby, G. Orpwood, & T. Russell (Eds.), Seeing curriculum in a new light: Essays from science education. Toronto: OISE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S.P. (1997). Intellectual independence for nonscientists and other content-transcendent goals of science education. Science Education, 81, 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S.P., & Phillips, L.M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S.P., & Phillips, L.M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1998). Eliciting, interpreting and developing teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Science and Education, 7, 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, M. (1989). Beyond the tacit framework of “science” and “science education” among science educators. In E. Whitelegg, J. Thomas, & S. Tresman (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for science education (pp. 247–250). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1998). Instrument design: A framework for assessing scientific literacy (Report of project managers meeting). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Programme for International Student Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, E. (1999). Transformative learning: Educational vision for the 2lst century. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J.E. (2001). Promoting argument in the science classroom: A rhetorical perspective. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(3), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. School Science Review, 82(301), 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.M., & Norris, S.P. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the reader’s world meets the world on paper? International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D.A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphases” in science education. Science Education, 66(2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockefeller Brothers Fund. (1958). The pursuit of excellence: Education and the future of America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A.C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge-Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society. (1985). The public understanding of science. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, J.L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, J. (2002). School science education for citizenship: Strategies for teaching about the epistemology of science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 637–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T.D., & Zeidler, D.L. (2005a). The significance of content for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T.D., & Zeidler, D.L. (2005b). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, C. (1989). Why scientists should popularize science. American Journal of Physics, 57(4), 295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortland, M. (1988). Advocating science: Literacy and public understanding. Impact of Science on Society, 38(4), 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M.L., & Zeidler, D. (2003). Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific issues. In D.L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 81–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.P. (1962). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (2001). Teaching for scientific literacy: What could it mean? School Science Review, 52(300), 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., & Thomas, J. (1999). Science education for the public understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 33, 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S.A., Gess-Newsome, J., & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists’ beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 669–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuewer, R..E. (1998). History and Physics. Science and Education, 7, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutman, F.X. (1996). Science literacy: A functional definition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 459–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., & Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In M. Shortland (Ed.), Scientific literacy papers (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Department for External Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippens, D.J., Nichols, S.E., & Bryan, L.A. (2000). International science educators’ perceptions of scientific literacy. In S.K. Abell (Ed.), Science teacher education: An international perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom, Select Committee on Science and Technology, House of Lords. (2000). Science and society (3rd report, session 1999–2000). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1993). International forum on scientific and technological literacy for all (Final report). Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States, National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States, National Science Board. (1998). Science and engineering indicators—1998. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. (1966). Why is it so important that science be understood? Impact of Science on Society, 16(1), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D.L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81(4), 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D., Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2003). The role of argument during discourse about socioscientific issues. In D.L. Zeidler (Ed), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 97–116). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Canada

    Derek Hodson

Authors
  1. Derek Hodson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hodson, D. Why We Should Prioritize Learning about Science. Can J Sci Math Techn 6, 293–311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556703

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556703

Search

Navigation